![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
I think this article is trying to kill my brain D:
"This temporal incoherence becomes manifest in the dissonance engendered by our simultaneous commitments to notions of contextual finitude and contextual transcendence, and by our description of a seemingly natural triune evolutionary managerial sequence of phases that eventually reach closure (a finite linear process), together with our vision of preternaturally unchanging, infinite, absolute objects or phenomena (archival records) and, finally, by our sense of documentary permanence and acknowledgement of historical contingency and change."
That is ONE SENTENCE, people. ONE. I mean, I do actually understand what he's saying there (barely), but bloody hell, would it kill him to cough up that dictionary?
"This temporal incoherence becomes manifest in the dissonance engendered by our simultaneous commitments to notions of contextual finitude and contextual transcendence, and by our description of a seemingly natural triune evolutionary managerial sequence of phases that eventually reach closure (a finite linear process), together with our vision of preternaturally unchanging, infinite, absolute objects or phenomena (archival records) and, finally, by our sense of documentary permanence and acknowledgement of historical contingency and change."
That is ONE SENTENCE, people. ONE. I mean, I do actually understand what he's saying there (barely), but bloody hell, would it kill him to cough up that dictionary?
